Research
Human change leaves evidence.
Research is how we discover, and substantiate, what the consulting and the software are built on. Written to invite scrutiny, replication, and debate. Written to be argued with.
The paperBeyond the Snapshot
Beyond the Snapshot documents a longitudinal, AI-assisted framework for observing how human paradigms actually change: the assumptions, patterns, limitations, and emerging questions behind the work. Written for researchers, practitioners, and partners.
- Why snapshots fail: the gap between knowing what to change and changing the system producing it. The one problem worth owning: visibility over time.
- The wedge, made concrete: how longitudinal, multimodal observation of behavioural evidence differs from journaling apps, mood trackers, and AI chat companions.
- A falsifiable research plan: the measures, comparisons, and kill criteria for testing whether paradigm change can be systematically observed.
- An honest evidence base, including where the science is contested, and an ethics-first model for a sensitive domain.
Read the research brief
Get the paper.
Enter your email and Beyond the Snapshot lands in your inbox. Free, no funnel.
Prefer to read it now? Open the PDF directly ↓
What's nextFuture publications
The research programme is expanding from individual paradigm change toward organisational intelligence: the same longitudinal lens, applied at two levels of scale. In progress:
Organisational Intelligence Benchmark
How organisations capture knowledge, structure decisions and connect outcomes, and where the reasoning breaks down.
AI in Decision-Making
Where AI genuinely improves organisational decisions, where it degrades them, and how to tell the difference.
Behaviour & Performance
Longitudinal behavioural evidence and its relationship to leadership and performance, extending the Beyond the Snapshot framework.
Publication claims stay honest: these are planned research directions, not finished studies. Each will be published with its methodology and limitations, like the first paper.
Argue with us.
If you're a researcher, practitioner or partner and something in the paper looks wrong, that's exactly the conversation we want.
Get in touch